- Regular Price
- MRP 19.99
- Sale Price
- MRP 19.99
- Regular Price
- MRP 19.99
- Unit Price
- per
Table of contents
Skin care practices have changed dramatically over time – or have they? Apparently, the concept of skincare seems to have transformed completely from what it used to be traditionally. Once turmeric and ubtan defined skincare, but today targeted cleansers and barrier repair are prioritised routines.
Now the question is: Did the philosophy of skincare truly change with time or did certain terms and methods evolve through the generations?
Without any further ado, let’s find out what has changed in skincare over the years!
Traditional skincare was simple, natural and mostly focused on preventive care. It was nothing that would resemble a regime or ritual - something that is currently into play (Hubbard, 2025). Skincare practices were habits that were passed down through generations and was not judged as something separate from self-care – an extension to healthy living.
The traditional mindset of skin health and wellbeing was closely knitted in daily habits like diet, hydration, sleep alongside some topical care options (Deng et al., 2025). Traditionally, most people used kitchen ingredients and plant-based remedies for taking care of their skin. Common traditional care practices included turmeric for brightening, sandalwood for soothing, gram flour for cleansing milk or yoghurt for nourishment etc.
Traditionally most people made use of a varied range of oils like coconut, sesame and almond for deep massage and moisturization. Furthermore, some other people used to rely on rice flour, ubtan or the like for scrubbing and exfoliating dirt and dead skin cells from the skin surface (Capstone Medical Centre, 2025).
The approach to skincare was mostly straightforward and relied mostly on the preventive mindset, rather than targeting individual concerns people mostly prioritised overall skin health with natural care. So, skincare was more than just trends and lifelong habits that was followed for maintaining overall skin integrity and wellbeing.
Aspect |
Traditional Skincare |
Gen Z Skincare |
Core Philosophy |
Focused on overall skin health through natural care and preventive practices |
Focused on skin health through structured, science-backed and targeted routines |
Approach |
Simple, straightforward and habit-based |
Detailed, structured and regimen-specific |
Mindset |
Preventive and holistic |
Preventive, corrective and personalized |
Skincare View |
Seen as an extension of self-care and healthy living |
Seen as a combination of wellness and science-backed skincare |
Primary Focus |
Maintaining overall skin integrity and balance |
Addressing individual skin concerns and improving skin barrier health |
Routine Structure |
No fixed skincare routine or steps |
Clear structured routine (CTMPR) |
Cleansing |
Water, gram flour, milk or herbal pastes |
Targeted cleansers for dirt, oil, sweat, makeup and pollutants |
Toning |
Rose water or herbal waters for refreshing skin |
Hydration, pH balancing and product absorption |
Moisturization |
Natural oils like coconut, sesame and almond oil |
Moisturizers with ceramides, hyaluronic acid and glycerine |
Exfoliation |
Ubtan, rice flour and natural scrubs |
Chemical or physical exfoliation through formulated products |
Ingredients Used |
Kitchen ingredients and plant-based remedies |
Active ingredients and clinically backed formulations |
Common Ingredients |
Turmeric, sandalwood, milk, yogurt, oils |
Ceramides, hyaluronic acid, niacinamide, actives |
Decision Drivers |
Family traditions and generational wisdom |
Social media, ingredient education and digital awareness |
Problem Solving |
Broad care for overall skin wellness |
Targeted treatment for specific skin issues |
Personalization |
More universal and collective approach |
Highly personalized and skin-type specific |
Psychology |
Collective and tradition-driven |
Individualistic and information-driven |
The modernised concept of skincare is far more structured, detailed and personalised as Gen Z mostly views it as a combination of both wellness practice and science-backed ritual that targets individual skin concerns (Shim et al., 2024).
Today’s skincare philosophy heavily relies on understanding the skin type, the skin barrier health and targeted treatments. Different factors like social media, ingredient education and digital accessibility have been playing a specific role in shaping this information-focused mindset.
A clear structure of skincare approach is followed currently that is commonly known as Cleansing, Toning, Moisturizing, Protection and Repair (CTMPR). It has emerged as an ‘Essential Skincare Regime’. Cleansing, the very first step, has been viewed as the foundation of effective skincare, as it helps in removing dirt, oil, sweat, makeup residue and pollutants (Choudhary et al., 2026).
Toning came second to cleansing but the very definition of toning was reversed eventually. It used to be viewed as an element of oil control but today it is perceived as a perfect solution for keeping the skin hydrated, balancing pH and preparing the skin for better absorption of ingredients.
Similarly, the value of moisturization has emerged in modern skincare as a support to skin barrier, prevent TEWL and bind hydrating agents to the skin. In this connection, a wide range of ingredients are used like ceramides, hyaluronic acid, glycerine etc for moisturization. So, the Gen Z psychology of skincare is shaped by personalisation, preventive care and making informed choices rather than falling for universal skincare approach (India Today, 2025).
Comment below your personal experiences and thoughts!
0 comments